Blaine M. Hackman

Blaine M. Hackman

(he/him/his)
Counsel | Post-Grant Proceedings
212.849.3352 Blaine.Hackman@WolfGreenfield.com LinkedIn Profile

Education

  • Harvey Mudd College, BS, Chemistry, High Honors
  • Columbia University, PhD, Organic Chemistry
  • Georgetown University Law Center, JD

Key Technologies

  • Pharmaceuticals and Biologics 
  • Chemicals and Materials
  • Nanotechnology
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Analytical Chemistry

Practice Groups

Admitted to Practice

  • New York
  • US Patent and Trademark Office
  • US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Location

  • New York

Overview

Blaine Hackman focuses his practice on post-grant proceedings before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and related patent litigation, prosecution, and counseling. Blaine regularly represents clients in inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), with an emphasis on biotechnology and pharmaceutical technologies.

In addition to his active post-grant proceedings practice, Blaine works with clients on the full spectrum of their intellectual property needs. He has experience representing pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients in intellectual property litigation (including Hatch-Waxman proceedings) and advising clients on patent issues, including patentability and freedom-to-operate (FTO) evaluations. He has also prosecuted patents and counseled clients in transactions in a variety of technologies, including small molecule and protein therapies, nanotechnology, diagnostic imaging, and analytical chemistry.

Blaine actively publishes, presents, and provides insights to the media on intellectual property-related issues.


Experience

  • Represented petitioner, a clinical stage pharmaceutical company, a PGR challenging a patent claiming therapeutic compounds related targeted protein degradation, which led to patent owner’s disclaimer of the challenged patent.
  • Represented petitioner, a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, in two IPRs challenging to patents related to protein mimetics, which led to a favorable confidential settlement.
  • Represented a major biotechnology company as defendant/petitioner in co-pending district court and PGR proceedings relating to a monoclonal antibody therapy, which resulted in entry of adverse judgment in the PGR with cancellation of the asserted patent and dismissal of the district court case.
  • Represented a specialty pharmaceutical company as plaintiff/patent owner in co-pending district court Hatch-Waxman litigations and multiple IPR proceedings, which resulted in the denial of institution for all IPRs and favorable district court settlements.
  • Represented a major pharmaceutical company in securing a reissue patent in the USPTO covering its blockbuster cancer treatment.
  • Advised a major investor in pharmaceutical and biotechnology royalty streams on patent issues for several transactions.

Activities

  • Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Bar Association
  • American Chemical Society

Recognition

  • Named to the list of New York Rising Stars by Super Lawyers (2017-2022)
  • Recognized by Licensing Executive Society International Journal, les Nouvelles, for publishing an Article of the Month (2014)
  • Dow Chemical Foundation Scholar, Harvey Mudd College

Publications

See All Publications
(SizeLimitingPyList: [{year_group=2021, publish_date=2021-06-21 04:00:00, name=Chief Judge Prost: A Defender of Clarity in Patent Law, absolute_url=https://wolfgreenfield.com/publications/articles/2021/chief-judge-probst-a-defender-of-clarity-in-patent-law}, {year_group=2020, publish_date=2020-11-12 05:00:00, name=PTAB Mylan Decision Could Be Boon To Drug Innovators, absolute_url=https://wolfgreenfield.com/publications/articles/2020/ptab-mylan-decision-could-be-boon-to-drug-innovators}, {year_group=2020, publish_date=2020-06-25 04:00:00, name=Expert Discovery Protections: Comparing District Courts with the PTAB, absolute_url=https://wolfgreenfield.com/publications/articles/2020/expert-discovery-protections-comparing-district-courts-with-the-ptab}, {year_group=2019, publish_date=2019-05-17 04:00:00, name=Recent Federal Circuit Decisions on Obviousness-Type Double Patenting May Shape Life Science Patent Portfolio Management, absolute_url=https://wolfgreenfield.com/publications/articles/2019/recent-federal-circuit-decisions-on-obviousness}])
2021 2020 2019

Recent News

See All News

Events