Patent Deposition Notices With Minimal Motion Practice Risk
An article written by Charlie Steenburg, Jason Balich, and Alex Kim titled “Patent Deposition Notices With Minimal Motion Practice Risk” was published in Law360
Articles
Federal Circuit Affirms As Obvious Suite of Patents Directed to Methods Of Treating Opioid Overdose
Introduction In February of 2022, the Federal Circuit affirmed a New Jersey District Court’s determination that four patents claiming methods of treating opioid overdose by intranasal administration o...
Takedown Notice Falsely Alleging Counterfeiting Is Adequate Basis for False Advertising Claim
Author: Brian Darville, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Verifier: Doug Wolf, Wolf Greenfield
Issue Preclusion Means One Strike and You Are Out
While issue preclusion means one strike and you are out, a court might need to call a few balls before calling the strike that ends the case.
Women’s History Month Q&A: Helen Lockhart
March is Women's History Month, where Americans commemorate and encourage the study, observance, and celebration of the vital role of women in history. We honor the women at Wolf Greenfield year round...
Women’s History Month Q&A: Elisabeth Hunt
March is Women's History Month, where Americans commemorate and encourage the study, observance, and celebration of the vital role of women in history. We honor the women at Wolf Greenfield year round...
Women’s History Month Q&A: Maryanne Trevisan
March is Women's History Month, where Americans commemorate and encourage the study, observance, and celebration of the vital role of women in history. We honor the women at Wolf Greenfield year round...
The Federal Circuit Rejects Admitted Prior Art as the “Basis” for IPR Proceedings
Under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), a Petitioner may seek to institute an IPR on grounds that “could be raised under section 102 or 103 and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed public...
The Trademark Reporter's 2022 “Annual Review of US Trademark Cases”
The 2022 “Annual Review of US Trademark Cases,” co-authored by John L. Welch of Wolf Greenfield and Theodore H. Davis, Jr. of Kilpatrick Townsend and titled “The Seventy-Fourth Year of Administration ...
Why File a Design Application?
Design applications may be a cost effective way to protect a commercialized product from competitors, or supplement other coverage of a utility application. In commercialized products, the design and ...
Federal Circuit Clarifies Statutory Estoppel in Litigations with Co-Pending IPRs
Section 315(e)(2) states that once a final decision issues in an IPR challenging a claim, the Petitioner “may not assert either in [court or the ITC] that the claim is invalid on any ground that the p...
Misconstrued – The Federal Circuit Vacates the PTAB’s Construction of a Key Claim Term in Intel v. Qualcomm
The Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s construction of a claim term, underscoring the principle that proper claim construction may require a close examination of the specification and other available ...